Monday, January 16, 2012

Logging

Film: Girl With A Dragon Tattoo

So many questions. First, why does Daniel Craig wear his glasses like an Abraham Lincoln beard for the entire movie? Is that an actual thing people do? Was this how Craig won the role? Did he walk into Fincher's office and say, look David, since all I'll be doing all movie is looking at old photographs and walking through snow, I better have something to do with my hands, so I'll just be wearing my glasses from my cheek to my neck and every time I need to read something, I'll have to move them to my eyes. Then, people will know I am acting.

Second question, what makes David Fincher make this film? Does the man just want to work? That can't possibly be it. He must have his choice of projects from now until 2020. He can't need money. He does not need a hit to remain relevant. Our arguably best working director selects this garbage material? I cannot fathom he was actually drawn to the book or the story. What was the point of this movie? The best explanation I can imagine is that he had a great idea for the title sequence.

Okay, so the first 1+ hours, all I could think about was how much better an episode of Law and Order SVU was at storytelling that this nonsense. Finally, maybe at the 1.5 hour mark, there is a like a 20 minute sequence that was tension filled. Then we get the scene with the bad guy explaining himself, which as far as bad guy explaining themselves scenes, was a good one, which is sort of like saying she was hot for a fat girl.

Then, we have the ridiculous 4th act of the movie that turns into the easiest embezzlement of 32 million dollars I've ever seen, followed by one actual human moment of empathy at the very end of the movie.

I knew I wasn't going to like this film. I knew it when I read the book. I knew it when I saw the preview. It is only my regard for Fincher that brought me to the theater, but this man is making a growing list of couldn't-pay-me-to-watch-again-movies.

4 comments:

PWD said...

When/If Fincher finds written material that is up to his talent, that movie will really be something. It's a testament to his directorial skill that he could elevate the hack source material of The Social Network & Dragon Tattoo.

Greg said...

i realized on my way over to work this may have been a one for us, one for them deal w/ sony and rudin. rudin/fincher get to make social network if they also agree to do dragon tattoo. that would at least make plausible sense to me. i see why fincher makes social network - that is a different type of movie for him, exploring new themes, tone, etc. the cost of doing that was doing dragon tattoo. this makes plausible sense to me.

PWD said...

Still. I found the first two hours compelling, engaging, and tension filled. Must've liked it a lot more than you. Didn't at all think it was a wasted of time.
The 4th act is a different matter completely.

Greg said...

i would have liked it more if i didn't hate the book and modestly enjoy the sweedish movie. the fact the sweedish movie already exists should really count against the film. originality should be rewarded by the audience, just like repetition should be punished.