Taunting As Strategy

Has anyone in the national security establishment considered "taunting" Al Queda as a viable war-time strategy. It seems that organization and it's members would be particularly vulnerable to big-time public taunting.

I would start by declaring Al Queda an impotent effectiveless organization without any existing infrastructure. I'd point to their utter incapability of attacking anyone anywhere - civilians or military post 9/11. I'd argue 9/11 was an act of luck and really the result of one strong terrorist - Mohammed Atta - and Al Queda has no one and will never have anyone of his caliber again. I'd point out they don't have a single sustainable victory in any country - ever. Their only victories are parasitic victories where other people took over lands temporarily and Al Queda claimed those victories for themselves (ie Afghanistan).

Just for starters...