Faulty Assumptions

LA spent billions on homelessness only to double the homeless population, solve absolutely nothing, but managed to employ a bunch of regulatory busybodies. 

Here are the faulty assumptions:

1) We can build "affordable housing." The houses aren't affordable. They are extremely costly to the taxpayer (600K plus).

2) The homeless should get to live in LA communities. Venice beach is some of the most expensive real estate in the world. Why would we build services for homeless in this area? It's an absolutely beyond insane use of resources.

I have the solution. Permanent Burning Man in the Nevada desert. How much will it cost per person. Not 600K, but the price of a single bus ticket to Nevada. There, all the homeless activists will be employed to build toilets, housing, and provide free drugs and music and art installations to entertain the homeless. This will solve multiple problems at once - get rid of the homeless, get rid of the homeless activists, and let all of them live their American dream of doing jack shit.