LA Times...

...still needs work. The headline reads: "A necessary evil: the captive dogs whose blood saves live." 

Me, a dumb reader, is like: fuck yeah. That sounds like an awesome story. But within the first paragraph you of course discover the lives being saved by dog blood are sick pets. Not as compelling, is it? 

"Saves lives" - they do realize this term suggests human lives, right? Who are these writers and editors? Seriously.