This Surrogacy Story
A woman is hired to be a surrogate; the couple finds out the kid will have a bad medical condition, and they want to abort the child. But the surrogate decides she can't allow it and flees to Texas...
Pretty bonkers and quite a moral conundrum, actually...Richard Hanania thinks the lady should be charged with kidnapping. What an outrageous idea! To acknowledge kidnapping is to acknowledge personhood, which is to acknowledge that abortion is murder. Are we going there?
Some questions to consider:
What if the unborn child didn't have a medical condition? But the biological parents still wanted the abortion? Would that change the scenario?
Who will raise this child? Who will pay for his/her medical care?
What happened to the pro-choice argument about "her body, her choice." Does this apply to the surrogate? Or to the biological mother? The biological parents?
Does the biological mother here get more say over the situation than the biological father (as they would if she were carrying the baby)? Or, does the mother get less say since she's NOT carrying the baby?
That is to say, what if the father sided with the surrogate and wanted to keep the baby and the mother didn't?
This case is truly, truly difficult to square across numerous dimensions.