World Cup
VAR resulted in Balogun receiving a red card. Now, a review of VAR has taken away the suspension. Please make it make sense. Does it mean the red card was a mistake? Does it mean the original referee's non-call was correct? No, we are going to be forced to accept that the VAR call was correct, the VAR post-match review of the call was correct, and that the rules are correct even though none of them make sense.
One of my favorite Henry Miller quotes: "Consistency is the hobgoblin of simple minds." Always liked the quote because it got at the complexities of the real world. That some things are apples and oranges. I never anticipated, however, the reverse impact of this idea. That we'd reach a point where we are expected to accept that oranges are not oranges - sometimes. What is this madness we've created? VAR is designed to make less controversy. Has it? Is there any less controversy? Did anyone watch the Paraguay match against France? There were 4 yellow cards and arguably several red cards by Paraguay. Not a one was issued. In the old days, this would be on the ref. We establish VAR to help correct this. But the VAR isn't used . Then it gets used in the Balogun instance. Why? It wasn't even a dangerous play.