Logging
TV: East of Eden
I don't understand the glowing reviews. Opening episode is cringe on its own terms. But the true flaw is the contempt for the original work. Turned a biblical epic into a millennial attempt at romance fiction. I needed to return to the book to remember why the Cathy character was so memorable...and indeed they screw the pooch with her depiction. They turn her from a monster into a victim. But the plot only makes sense when she's a monster. This is a character who we learn at age 16 murders her parents because they begin to deduce what trouble she is and want to restrict her freedom. A pure wolf in sheep's clothing. But in the show, she's a victim of abuse and grooming and awkward male longing...and then she kills her parents because her father spanked her. Huh? What? I was completely baffled by this choice given how she's portrayed in the show. I mean, totally crazy and nonsensical. And then...oh god...then they seem to be doing this thing about her and Charles being in love. Good lord. This is a character who from an early age discovers she can use sexuality for power. What a fascinating discovery! But no...they underplay this at every turn...she uses sexuality as a survival skill. Much worse. Many other deviations in the work, all of which make the character work more shallow. Charles intends to kill Adam one night, but can't find him. Gone. Adam discovers prior to his death that his father is a fraud and hence, he becomes a wayward soul but in the show, he only discovers this after his father's death and so his waywardness makes even less sense. I grasp some of these developments may be not so easy to dramatize for the screen but it gets me wondering why adapt East of Eden at all...
My guess is Florence Pugh and Zoey Kazan could not relate to Cathy or perhaps lacked the imagination to. They don't know what Werner Herzog calls the "ecstasy of evil". Read more male authors.